subject:"\[Issue 15951\] Inefficiencies in struct initialization"

[Issue 15951] Inefficiencies in struct initialization

2017-08-25 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15951 anonymous4 changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 15951] Inefficiencies in struct initialization

2016-08-16 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15951 --- Comment #6 from Johan Engelen --- Same issue: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11331 --

[Issue 15951] Inefficiencies in struct initialization

2016-07-06 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15951 --- Comment #5 from Johannes Pfau --- Spec problem #4: = void initializers for fields are not even mentioned in the spec. The only part mentioning = void initializers is for variables. We can't really do anything about this in the compiler backend

[Issue 15951] Inefficiencies in struct initialization

2016-06-20 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15951 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuc...@gdcproject.org --

[Issue 15951] Inefficiencies in struct initialization

2016-06-20 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15951 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johannesp...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from J

[Issue 15951] Inefficiencies in struct initialization

2016-05-27 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15951 Johan Engelen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbc.enge...@gmail.com --

[Issue 15951] Inefficiencies in struct initialization

2016-04-23 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15951 --- Comment #3 from Andrei Alexandrescu --- (In reply to Walter Bright from comment #2) > Please don't use URL shorteners, as they 'expire' after a while and then the > historical record of bugzilla becomes lost. Better yet, simply cut&paste the > da