https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16474
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16474
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuc...@gdcproject.org
--- Comment #12 from Ia
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16474
ki...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ki...@gmx.net
--- Comment #11 from ki...@gmx.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16474
--- Comment #10 from uplink.co...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to kinke from comment #9)
>
> So how does newCTFE interact with CTFloat at the moment? This is an
> important piece for cross-compilers. And is there an estimate for when
> newCTFE will l
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16474
--- Comment #9 from ki...@gmx.net ---
(In reply to uplink.coder from comment #7)
> (In reply to ZombineDev from comment #6)
> > Manu, you may be interested in trying LDC as it will soon support much more
> > intrinsics at CTFE than dmd. For reference:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16474
--- Comment #8 from ZombineDev ---
I don't think so, but see the PR for yourself ;)
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16474
--- Comment #7 from uplink.co...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to ZombineDev from comment #6)
> Manu, you may be interested in trying LDC as it will soon support much more
> intrinsics at CTFE than dmd. For reference:
> https://github.com/ldc-developer
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16474
ZombineDev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petar.p.ki...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Zom
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16474
--- Comment #5 from Manu ---
True, but that could still be a long way off, and this should have already been
working like, 10 years ago... it'd be good to have a default fix in existing
ctfe code.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16474
--- Comment #4 from uplink.co...@googlemail.com ---
newCTFE is eventually going to fix that.
and other compile-time floating-point issues as well.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16474
--- Comment #3 from Manu ---
Come on... surely it's reasonable to expect all builtin operators should work
at ctfe!! ;)
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16474
--- Comment #2 from Manu ---
Sure, or reals, whatever precision the compiler does floating point constant
folding would be fine.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16474
uplink.co...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uplink.co...@googlemail.com
---
13 matches
Mail list logo