[Issue 18615] Rebindable!A doesn't use class A's opEquals (returns a is b instead)

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18615 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/phobos https://github.com/dlang/phobos/commit/65b1f1af77b099ab97c94d802f027fa89cef0165 Fix Issue 18615 - Rebindable!A calls A.opEquals The

[Issue 18615] Rebindable!A doesn't use class A's opEquals (returns a is b instead)

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18615 github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 18615] Rebindable!A doesn't use class A's opEquals (returns a is b instead)

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18615 Simon Naarmann changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --

[Issue 18615] Rebindable!A doesn't use class A's opEquals (returns a is b instead)

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18615 --- Comment #4 from Simon Na. --- I've got a PR for Phobos ready at: https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/6370 The root cause was that union equality is always bitwise. The compiler issue is 15828, and the consensus seems that

[Issue 18615] Rebindable!A doesn't use class A's opEquals (returns a is b instead)

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18615 Seb changed: What|Removed |Added CC||greensunn...@gmail.com ---

[Issue 18615] Rebindable!A doesn't use class A's opEquals (returns a is b instead)

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18615 Simon Na. changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2

[Issue 18615] Rebindable!A doesn't use class A's opEquals (returns a is b instead)

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18615 Simon Na. changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@puremagic.com|eiderd...@gmail.com --

[Issue 18615] Rebindable!A doesn't use class A's opEquals (returns a is b instead)

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18615 greenify changed: What|Removed |Added CC||greeen...@gmail.com ---