https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18788
Nick Treleaven changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@geany.org
--- Comment #9 from Nick Tre
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18788
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P4
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18788
anonymous4 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||betterC, performance
See Also|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18788
Seb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greensunn...@gmail.com
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18788
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #7 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18788
ZombineDev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petar.p.ki...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Zom
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18788
Mike Franklin changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://issues.dlang.org/sh
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18788
--- Comment #5 from Mike Franklin ---
Another way of achieving the same result would be to make a `scope`d dynamic
array allocate on the stack
---
class C { }
void main()
{
scope C c = new C(); // `c` is allocated on the stack
scope i
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18788
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||issues.dl...@jmdavisprog.co
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18788
Adam D. Ruppe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||destructiona...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 fro
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18788
--- Comment #2 from Mike Franklin ---
Yes it is unsafe, but not any less safe than
void unsafeRecursion(size_t iterations)
{
if(iterations)
{
byte[256] buffer;
unsafeRecursion(--iterations);
}
}
As a compromise it could
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18788
Nicholas Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iamthewilsona...@hotmail.co
12 matches
Mail list logo