[Issue 18973] @disable on const toHash causes unresolved symbol error

2020-05-09 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18973 LucienPe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 18973] @disable on const toHash causes unresolved symbol error

2020-05-09 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18973 elpenguin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Issue 18973] @disable on const toHash causes unresolved symbol error

2020-05-09 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18973 --- Comment #3 from LucienPe --- (In reply to elpenguino+D from comment #2) > Incorrect. a @disabled method does not need a body, as no references to it > are ever emitted. You can observe this for yourself by simply renaming > toHash in the example

[Issue 18973] @disable on const toHash causes unresolved symbol error

2020-05-09 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18973 LucienPe changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||link-failure, rejects-valid --

[Issue 18973] @disable on const toHash causes unresolved symbol error

2022-07-06 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18973 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #4 from Dlang Bot --- @Geod24

[Issue 18973] @disable on const toHash causes unresolved symbol error

2022-07-07 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18973 Dlang Bot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---