subject:"\[Issue 2029\] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE"

[Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE

2009-09-15 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2029 Tomas Lindquist Olsen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||to...@famolsen.dk --- Comment

[Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE

2009-09-15 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2029 Don changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.013 |1.020 --- Comment #2 from Don 2009-09-15 07:30:

[Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE

2009-09-15 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2029 --- Comment #3 from Don 2009-09-15 07:42:03 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > I'd like this to work too :) I guess I should make a patch ... > > I had a quick go at it before the last release. I didn't include it

[Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE

2009-11-18 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2029 --- Comment #4 from Tomas Lindquist Olsen 2009-11-18 03:40:17 PST --- Created an attachment (id=501) draft patch for fixing typesafe variadic and ctfe -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE

2009-11-18 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2029 --- Comment #6 from Tomas Lindquist Olsen 2009-11-18 03:48:50 PST --- I forgot to mention, the patch is against the latest dmd-1.x branch -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

[Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE

2009-11-18 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2029 --- Comment #5 from Tomas Lindquist Olsen 2009-11-18 03:46:13 PST --- I've attached a draft patch that replaces the typesafe variadic ast rewrites to something that works in any scope (and with ctfe). without the patch the following function:

[Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE

2009-11-21 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2029 --- Comment #7 from Tomas Lindquist Olsen 2009-11-21 06:21:44 PST --- So... Noone cares? ... This is a *draft*. I'm looking for feedback on how to better fix this, while the patch isn't perfect, it does fix the bug. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE

2009-11-25 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2029 --- Comment #8 from Don 2009-11-25 21:23:48 PST --- Thanks, this is helpful. The problem is, that this isn't an isolated bug: the struct constructor bug has the same root cause. I think we need to fix both of them at once. -- Configure issuem

[Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE

2009-12-23 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2029 --- Comment #9 from Don 2009-12-23 01:34:48 PST --- The solution is much, much simpler. The problem is that CTFE doesn't support casting array literals to their base type, even though it's a no-op! constfold.c, inside Expression *Cast(Type *t

[Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE

2009-12-23 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2029 --- Comment #10 from Don 2009-12-23 01:50:30 PST --- Oops, we still don't support C-style variadics. The patch to interpret.c should be: -if (tf->varargs) +if (tf->varargs && arguments && parameters && arguments->dim != parameters->di

[Issue 2029] Typesafe variadic functions don't work in CTFE

2009-12-30 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2029 --- Comment #12 from Walter Bright 2009-12-29 03:08:36 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) > Changeset 318 Wrong changeset, oops! 318 is for bugzilla 282 -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- Yo