https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23376
Dennis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23376
--- Comment #6 from Dlang Bot ---
@dkorpel created dlang/dlang.org pull request #3419 "Issue 23376 - Allow
multi-code-point HTML entities" mentioning this issue:
- Issue 23376 - Allow multi-code-point HTML entities
https://github
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23376
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #5 from Dlang Bot ---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23376
--- Comment #4 from Dennis ---
(In reply to Dennis from comment #3)
> Looking at the source code, it seems like the only reason is because no one
> bothered to implement it. `Lexer.escapeSequence` returns a single `dchar`,
> so it would require a
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23376
--- Comment #3 from Dennis ---
(In reply to Bolpat from comment #2)
> Maybe the reason for not supporting them is they’d be the only escape
> sequence to introduce multiple code-points, thus counting the number of
> code-points / code-units becomes
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23376
--- Comment #2 from Bolpat ---
(In reply to Dennis from comment #1)
> I don't like enhancements based on hypothetical users. Are there actual
> users running into this limitation?
>
> My impression is that it's a rarely used feature, but it's not
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23376
Dennis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dkor...@live.nl
--- Comment #1 from Dennis ---
I
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23376
Bolpat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qs.il.paperi...@gmail.com
--
