https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
--- Comment #8 from Dlang Bot ---
dlang/phobos pull request #8642 "std.math.hardware: Fix broken IEEE FP flags
tests" was merged into master:
- 36b2f9c6aa3d705c9b2c019ebf4480b5980502ad by Iain Buclaw:
std.math.hardware: Fix broken IEEE FP flags
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
--- Comment #7 from Dlang Bot ---
@ibuclaw created dlang/phobos pull request #8642 "std.math.hardware: Fix broken
IEEE FP flags tests" mentioning this issue:
- std.math.hardware: Fix broken IEEE FP flags tests
1. The `pragma(inline, false)`
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw ---
Saying that... the way that pragmas are handled in the front-end is all over
the shop, with no coherent way to manage them (is a pragma standalone? must
have a body? statement only? declaration only? etc...), or
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to RazvanN from comment #3)
> That is true, but in your original bug report you want to apply the pragma
> to the declarations inside the body, right? To be able to do that you need
> to create a
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
--- Comment #4 from RazvanN ---
>
> That is true, but in your original bug report you want to apply the pragma
> to the declarations inside the body, right? To be able to do that you need
> to create a PragmaDeclaration and attach it to the the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
--- Comment #3 from RazvanN ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #2)
> (In reply to RazvanN from comment #1)
> > 1. We can implement the expected behavior by attaching the pragma to the
> > declaration, but given the existing machinery in the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to RazvanN from comment #1)
> 1. We can implement the expected behavior by attaching the pragma to the
> declaration, but given the existing machinery in the compiler this will
> require a lot of rework
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23520
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
10 matches
Mail list logo