https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
Dlang Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #15 from Dlang Bot ---
@jmdavi
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
--- Comment #14 from Dlang Bot ---
dlang/phobos pull request #8914 "Build: Add option USE_IMPORTC=0 to switch back
to compiling zlib with C compiler" was merged into master:
- c06255411a1a51b51aea24dd88bcf133f00c584e by Martin Kinkelin:
Build: Add
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
--- Comment #13 from Dlang Bot ---
dlang/dmd pull request #16184 "partial bugzilla 24389 - importC: Parser support
for top-level asm definitions" was merged into master:
- 78043dabcba037adf9de12b629745415e42609e2 by Iain Buclaw:
partial bugzilla 2
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
--- Comment #12 from Dlang Bot ---
@kinke created dlang/phobos pull request #8914 "Build: Add option USE_IMPORTC=0
to switch back to compiling zlib with C compiler" mentioning this issue:
- Build: Add option USE_IMPORTC=0 to switch back to compiling
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
kinke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ki...@gmx.net
--- Comment #11 from kinke ---
I agre
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan M Davis ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #9)
> Alternatively, there's reverting the change that introduced using DMD to
> build zlib.
Yeah, I was talking about what would be required for zlib to build with
impo
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
--- Comment #9 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Jonathan M Davis from comment #8)
> It doesn't look like qsort_r is being used by anything in Phobos right now,
> so I don't think that the __asm__ has to actually work in this case in order
> to build
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan M Davis ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jonathan M Davis from comment #0)
> > This is not an issue on the latest release of dmd - 2.070 - but it is an
> > issue on master. It looks like with 2
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
--- Comment #7 from Dlang Bot ---
@ibuclaw created dlang/dmd pull request #16184 "partial bugzilla 24389 -
importC: Parser support for top-level asm definitions" mentioning this issue:
- partial bugzilla 24389 - importC: Parser support for top-level
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw ---
Support can be simply added to the parser, but I can't see DMD doing anything
but ignore or error about it being there.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jonathan M Davis from comment #2)
> > ---
> > void __qsort_r_compat(void *, size_t, size_t, void *,
> > int (*)(void *, const void *, const void *));
>
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Jonathan M Davis from comment #2)
> ---
> void __qsort_r_compat(void *, size_t, size_t, void *,
> int (*)(void *, const void *, const void *));
> __asm__(".symver " "__qsort_r_compat" ", " "qsort_
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuc...@gdcproject.org
--- Comment #3 from Iai
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis ---
Created attachment 1905
--> https://issues.dlang.org/attachment.cgi?id=1905&action=edit
cpp output on .c file containing just #include
Okay. My experience with importC at this point is pretty much zero, so
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
--- Comment #1 from Walter Bright ---
There isn't quite enough information there. If you could compile with cpp to
capture the preprocessor output, we can pinpoint the exact line of failure.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24389
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ImportC
CC|
17 matches
Mail list logo
