[Issue 2698] Syntax to parse an identifier from a string, instead of mixin()

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2698 --- Comment #8 from Nick Treleaven --- (In reply to Nick Treleaven from comment #3) > I prefer the __identifier(ident) syntax than mixin(ident) > ... > 3. it doesn't refine the idea of mixin to more than just > expressions/statements (i.e. code, not

[Issue 2698] Syntax to parse an identifier from a string, instead of mixin()

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2698 --- Comment #7 from Nick Treleaven --- It seems feature requests without a dip champion will have to just exist in the memory of forum users then. One compromise would be to add a bugzilla resolution 'DIPNEEDED'. The point of this feature is to

[Issue 2698] Syntax to parse an identifier from a string, instead of mixin()

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2698 --- Comment #6 from Mathias LANG --- Nick: A couple years ago, at DConf if memory serves me well, the usage of Bugzilla was discussed and it was mentioned that more enhancement requests should go to the DIP queue. I unfortunately don't remember the

[Issue 2698] Syntax to parse an identifier from a string, instead of mixin()

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2698 --- Comment #5 from Nick Treleaven --- Mathias: so feature requests aren't allowed anymore in bugzilla? It has been marked as an enhancement. --

[Issue 2698] Syntax to parse an identifier from a string, instead of mixin()

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2698 Mathias LANG changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 2698] Syntax to parse an identifier from a string, instead of mixin()

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2698 Nick Treleaven changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Parameterised identifier|Syntax to parse an