subject:"\[Issue 2716\] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute"

[Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute

2010-08-28 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2716 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute

2010-08-28 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2716 Haruki Shigemori rayerd@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute

2010-08-28 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2716 Haruki Shigemori rayerd@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute

2010-01-02 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2716 --- Comment #14 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2010-01-02 03:08:20 PST --- (In reply to comment #13) (In reply to comment #1) An auto class and a scope class are the same thing. What do you think auto means in this context? I think

[Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute

2010-01-01 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2716 Haruki Shigemori rayerd@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|x86 |All

[Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute

2009-07-14 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2716 --- Comment #9 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2009-07-14 05:38:02 PDT --- (In reply to comment #8) storage class has no effect seems to be the wrong wording. I'll change it if you come up with a nicer error message. cannot be auto

[Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute

2009-07-14 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2716 --- Comment #10 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2009-07-14 05:40:37 PDT --- (In reply to comment #9) How about both auto and explicit type given? Or even both auto and explicit type given, use scope for RAII for the benefit of

[Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute

2009-07-14 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2716 --- Comment #11 from Christian Kamm kamm-removet...@incasoftware.de 2009-07-14 09:35:40 PDT --- I've switched the error message to both auto and explicit type given. auto class C {} will still trigger the storage class has no effect one

[Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute

2009-07-13 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2716 --- Comment #7 from Stewart Gordon s...@iname.com 2009-07-13 03:58:18 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Created an attachment (id=421) -- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=421) [details] Do not consider auto to mean scope.

[Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute

2009-07-13 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2716 Christian Kamm kamm-removet...@incasoftware.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute

2009-07-12 Thread d-bugmail

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2716 --- Comment #6 from Christian Kamm kamm-removet...@incasoftware.de 2009-07-12 08:23:17 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=421) -- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=421) Do not consider auto to mean scope. This is a patch

Re: [Issue 2716] Confusion of auto and scope as the class attribute

2009-03-10 Thread Sean Kelly

d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote: But there's something wrong - auto is still given on attribute.html, but the way it's used there it doesn't seem to be an attribute. 'auto' was originally and continues to be a storage class. It's the default storage class if another one isn't specified, so