[Issue 2810] Forward reference to an auto function

2010-05-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2810 Rainer Schuetze changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc --- Comment #

[Issue 2810] Forward reference to an auto function

2010-05-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2810 Rainer Schuetze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Issue 2810] Forward reference to an auto function

2009-09-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2810 --- Comment #5 from Sobirari Muhomori 2009-09-29 04:16:12 PDT --- A completely separate bug is actually what you described :) Auto functions are obviously supported, I'm not sure if it's still valid to treat the auto keyword as a storage class

[Issue 2810] Forward reference to an auto function

2009-09-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2810 Stewart Gordon changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||spec --- Comment #4 from Stewart Gord

[Issue 2810] Forward reference to an auto function

2009-09-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2810 Sobirari Muhomori changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Nonsensical forward |Forward reference to an