https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2816
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|1.042 |D1
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2816
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2816
--- Comment #13 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2009-12-31
11:11:36 PST ---
Fixed dmd 1.054 and 2.038
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2816
Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||llu...@gmail.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2816
--- Comment #11 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-18 17:13 ---
Found another bug in this patch. Should start the count from 0, not 1.
Otherwise you can get a segfault when the out-by-1 error shows up in the only
show first and last
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2816
--- Comment #6 from kamm-removet...@incasoftware.de 2009-04-08 07:43
---
Created an attachment (id=318)
-- (http://d.puremagic.com/issues/attachment.cgi?id=318action=view)
template instantiation trace patch
patch against DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2816
clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch |
--- Comment #2 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2816
--- Comment #4 from clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-04-07 10:47 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Don, LDC already implemented template instantiation traces. Check
StaticAssert::semantic2 and TemplateInstance::printInstantiationTrace. I
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2816
--- Comment #5 from shro8...@vandals.uidaho.edu 2009-04-07 11:07 ---
For that matter, if template errors could all be given optional (some flag?)
stack traces (not just chained errors) that would be cool.
I'm thinking somthing
