http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2832
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #1 from Don
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2832
Max Samukha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||samu...@voliacable.com
--- Comment #2 fr
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2832
--- Comment #3 from Don 2009-10-13 06:06:14 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Instead of introducing another inconsistency into the language for the
> not-so-common case, you could take the opposite route:
>
> pure int fun(int d, int divisor)
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2832
--- Comment #4 from Max Samukha 2009-10-13 08:44:23
PDT ---
> I think the existing behaviour -- that you cannot change any of the parameters
> in a pure function -- is simple and intuitive: pure functions can only modify
> variables which they
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2832
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
Seve
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2832
David Simcha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dsim...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #6 from D
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2832
Tomash Brechko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tomash.brec...@gmail.com
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2832
--- Comment #8 from Tomash Brechko 2010-09-22
08:05:37 PDT ---
Created separate issue http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4915 for
"int -> auto", as auto return type escapes pure completely.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremag
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2832
Jesse Phillips changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2832
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.020 |D2
--
10 matches
Mail list logo