https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2858
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|D1 & D2 |D2
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2858
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86 |All
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2858
--- Comment #9 from llu...@gmail.com 2009-04-20 07:25 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > SDWF tries to get around this by running a collection if creation of a GDI
> > > object f
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2858
--- Comment #8 from s...@iname.com 2009-04-20 04:28 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > SDWF tries to get around this by running a collection if creation of a GDI
> > object fails, in case it frees some system
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2858
--- Comment #7 from llu...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 20:07 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> SDWF tries to get around this by running a collection if creation of a GDI
> object fails, in case it frees some system resources in order to try aga
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2858
--- Comment #6 from llu...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 20:02 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I agree that making the finalizers more deterministic is a good idea.
> As discussed in the NG I see two problems:
>
> 1) the use of finalizers for
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2858
--- Comment #5 from s...@iname.com 2009-04-19 19:10 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
>> Perhaps better:
>>
>> The garbage collector runs the destructor for all unreferenced
>> objects before freeing their memory.
>
> At program exit th
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2858
--- Comment #4 from llu...@gmail.com 2009-04-19 18:41 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > To fix this, several paths can be taken:
> > 1) Guarantee finalization, at least at program end
> > 2) Remove finalizers completely from the collec
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2858
--- Comment #3 from s...@iname.com 2009-04-19 18:31 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I agree that making the finalizers more deterministic is a good idea.
> As discussed in the NG I see two problems:
>
> 1) the use of finalizers for an
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2858
fa...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fa...@gmx.ch
--- Comment #2 from f
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2858
s...@iname.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@iname.com
OS/Version|Linux
11 matches
Mail list logo
