[Issue 3321] debug flags

2009-09-16 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3321 --- Comment #1 from Ellery Newcomer 2009-09-16 20:23:48 PDT --- a quick peek in the source shows that debug <=> debug(1) is this sane behavior? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are re

[Issue 3321] debug flags

2009-09-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3321 Ary Borenszweig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@esperanto.org.ar --- Comment #2

[Issue 3321] debug flags

2009-09-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3321 --- Comment #3 from Ellery Newcomer 2009-09-17 07:44:38 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Yes, that's normal behaviour. According to whom? The C preprocessor? When I read the spec, I came away with the impression that debug should work like

[Issue 3321] debug flags

2011-06-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3321 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jlqu...@optonline.net --- Comment #4 from y

[Issue 3321] debug flags

2013-02-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3321 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull, spec CC|

[Issue 3321] debug flags

2013-02-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3321 --- Comment #6 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-02-06 17:53:08 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/

[Issue 3321] debug flags

2013-02-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3321 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|