https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Abscissa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||19105
Referenced Issues:
https://issues.dlang.org
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Abscissa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||19196
Referenced Issues:
https://issues.dlang.org
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 1197, which changed state.
Issue 1197 Summary: "static if" + enum.max/enum.min doesn't compile (D1 only)
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1197
What|Removed |Added
---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 1197, which changed state.
Issue 1197 Summary: "static if" + enum.max/enum.min doesn't compile (D1 only)
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1197
What|Removed |Added
---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 805, which changed state.
Issue 805 Summary: regression: forward reference when using templated classes
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=805
What|Removed |Added
-
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 1197, which changed state.
Issue 1197 Summary: "static if" + enum.max/enum.min doesn't compile (D1 only)
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1197
What|Removed |Added
---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 7482, which changed state.
Issue 7482 Summary: deprecation isn't checked inside forward referenced typeof()
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7482
What|Removed |Added
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 1170, which changed state.
Issue 1170 Summary: Cannot forward reference a type defined in a MixinStatement
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1170
What|Removed |Added
-
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 10739, which changed state.
Issue 10739 Summary: Struct defined by template mixin leads to
order-sensitivity of declarations
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10739
What|Removed |Add
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 19105, which changed state.
Issue 19105 Summary: Bogus recursive template expansion via getSymbolsByUDA
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19105
What|Removed |Added
---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 19105, which changed state.
Issue 19105 Summary: Bogus recursive template expansion via getSymbolsByUDA
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19105
What|Removed |Added
---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Basile-z changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b2.t...@gmx.com
Depends on|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Basile-z changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||9
Referenced Issues:
https://issues.dlang.org
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Basile-z changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||16012
Referenced Issues:
https://issues.dlang.org
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com
--- Comment #16 from Razva
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 19105, which changed state.
Issue 19105 Summary: Bogus recursive template expansion via getSymbolsByUDA
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19105
What|Removed |Added
---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 19105, which changed state.
Issue 19105 Summary: Bogus recursive template expansion via getSymbolsByUDA
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19105
What|Removed |Added
---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
--- Comment #18 from Basile-z ---
I've noticed this meta issue when I used to fix bugs and I think it was only
useful to show that there WAS a big problem in the compiler. There are more
that are not listed here and I think there will always be a few c
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Basile-z changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|b2.t...@gmx.com |
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 9397, which changed state.
Issue 9397 Summary: Size error with struct with ctor and self-typed nested enum
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9397
What|Removed |Added
-
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 12799, which changed state.
Issue 12799 Summary: Forward reference to nested enum with struct.sizeof
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12799
What|Removed |Added
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 6766, which changed state.
Issue 6766 Summary: Forward reference error for default struct/class arguments
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6766
What|Removed |Added
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|D1 & D2 |D2
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 3254, which changed state.
Issue 3254 Summary: [module] Module member visibility depends on declaration
order
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3254
What|Removed |Added
-
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 12553, which changed state.
Issue 12553 Summary: compilation fails if a forward referenced symbol
represents a value and is first used as template parameter
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12553
What|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 3206, which changed state.
Issue 3206 Summary: Class used as its member function parameter's default value
is considered implementating only lexically preceeding abstract functions
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=340
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-13 20:31 ---
There have been a few bugs listed here that aren't forward reference issues as
such, i.e. don't result from something being forward referenced, but
nonetheless have "forward de
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=340
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-13 21:30 ---
I think if you want to define forward references in the restricted classical
definition of "lexical precedence," then bugs like 1667 would not be covered by
this one. But it w
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=340
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-14 06:20 ---
I'm not sure what you mean by a semantic forward reference, but I guess you're
right about the basic essence of the bug.
> (funny - your last two comments were posted one year
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #8 from Don
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Rainer Schuetze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r.sagita...@gmx.de
--- Comment #9 fro
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=340
--- Comment #10 from Don 2009-09-16 01:13:39 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I created some patches dealing with about 5 issues that currently leave only
> 12
> bugs unfixed (of about 40 reports in bugzilla that deal with forward
> referenc
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=340
--- Comment #11 from Stewart Gordon 2009-09-16 01:53:01 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> No, nothing should go in this tracker. It's compensating for the lack of a
> 'forward-reference' keyword. Personally I'm not convinced that these tracker
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=340
--- Comment #13 from Stewart Gordon 2009-11-07 08:35:19 PST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Maybe it's too hard to fix it up!
To fix what up?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are re
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=340
--- Comment #14 from 罗勇刚 2009-11-11 05:26:17 PST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Maybe it's too hard to fix it up!
>
> To fix what up?
enum forward referenced hell.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=340
--- Comment #15 from Don 2010-12-08 23:57:58 PST ---
Once again, can people PLEASE STOP VOTING FOR THIS BUG!
This is *not* a bug. It's a tracker.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are re
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Stewart Gordon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||12665
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
det <2k...@gmx.net> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||2k...@gmx.net
Depends on|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 12665, which changed state.
Issue 12665 Summary: Cannot create enum of struct within the struct, if the
struct has a constructor ("cannot create a struct until its size is determined")
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Stewart Gordon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|12665 |9397
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Sobirari Muhomori changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||12799
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340
Issue 340 depends on issue 3254, which changed state.
Issue 3254 Summary: [module] Module member visibility depends on declaration
order
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3254
What|Removed |Added
-
43 matches
Mail list logo