[Issue 3544] optlink termination 0041338f with recursive nested functions

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3544 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Optlink --

[Issue 3544] optlink termination 0041338f with recursive nested functions

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3544 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|1.051 |D1 --

[Issue 3544] optlink termination 0041338f with recursive nested functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3544 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3544] optlink termination 0041338f with recursive nested functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3544 --- Comment #17 from Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com 2010-09-01 19:01:47 PDT --- I cannot reproduce this problem. Please show exactly what commands are given to dmd and the linker. -- Configure issuemail:

[Issue 3544] optlink termination 0041338f with recursive nested functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3544 --- Comment #15 from ante...@freemail.hu 2010-02-11 09:09:12 PST --- A clear error message would suffice. How could I expect more? It would not be bad if the stack size for ctfre could be set? Is there a way to set the stack size for ctfe?? --

[Issue 3544] optlink termination 0041338f with recursive nested functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3544 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code ---

[Issue 3544] optlink termination 0041338f with recursive nested functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3544 --- Comment #11 from ante...@freemail.hu 2009-12-12 00:06:04 PST --- Hi, Should I repost my example? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 3544] optlink termination 0041338f with recursive nested functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3544 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 3544] optlink termination 0041338f with recursive nested functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3544 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|optlink unexpected |optlink termination

[Issue 3544] optlink termination 0041338f with recursive nested functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3544 --- Comment #9 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-11-25 05:29:15 PST --- Even smaller test case. Seems it happens with a depth around 512; it's probably exceeding the maximum symbol length. --- char[] foo(int n) { return void abcde() { ~ (