[Issue 3577] Wrong precedence for opPow

2015-06-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3577 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|future |D2 --

[Issue 3577] Wrong precedence for opPow

2009-12-31 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3577 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3577] Wrong precedence for opPow

2009-12-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3577 --- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-12-21 15:36:28 PST --- TEST CASES FOR TEST SUITE (Note: doesn't include any of the runtime tests) - // Tests for ^^ // TODO: These tests should not require import

[Issue 3577] Wrong precedence for opPow

2009-12-05 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3577 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 3577] Wrong precedence for opPow

2009-12-05 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3577 --- Comment #2 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2009-12-05 12:56:29 PST --- To make it right-associative, change the key line in parsePowExp into: --- case TOKpow: nextToken(); e2 = parsePowExp(); e = new PowExp(loc,e,e2); continue; --