[Issue 3820] Small hole in switch semantics

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3820 Martin Krejcirik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 3820] Small hole in switch semantics

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3820 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |D2 --

[Issue 3820] Small hole in switch semantics

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3820 --- Comment #7 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2013-05-20 03:20:58 PDT --- IIRC this switch is implemented as below. Unless we expect the block to always run, as in comment 3, it's difficult to fix. int foo(int a) { switch (var) {

[Issue 3820] Small hole in switch semantics

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3820 Maxim Fomin ma...@maxim-fomin.ru changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ma...@maxim-fomin.ru

[Issue 3820] Small hole in switch semantics

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3820 d...@dawgfoto.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@dawgfoto.de --- Comment #4

[Issue 3820] Small hole in switch semantics

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3820 --- Comment #5 from d...@dawgfoto.de 2012-03-12 07:37:28 PDT --- You can only execute that block with a goto or a loop. The initialization should happen anyhow. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 3820] Small hole in switch semantics

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3820 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-03-11 14:14:59 PDT --- A probably related case: import std.stdio; enum Foo { A } void main() { Foo f = Foo.A; switch (f) { writeln(f); case Foo.A: break; } } With

[Issue 3820] Small hole in switch semantics

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3820 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com