[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2015-06-09 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.040 |D2 --

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2011-01-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #770 is|0 |1

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-10-29 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #769 is|0 |1

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-09-23 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #706 is|0 |1

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-09-23 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #705 is|0 |1

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-08-08 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com 2010-08-08 16:05:16 PDT --- I figured as much, but I didn't want to keep trying to keep my patch up-to-date if there were definitely a problem with it that made it unacceptable. So,

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-06-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #670 is|0 |1

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-06-22 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #580 is|0 |1

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-03-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #573 is|0 |1

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-03-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #577 is|0 |1

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-03-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #578 is|0 |1

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-03-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 --- Comment #7 from Sobirari Muhomori dfj1es...@sneakemail.com 2010-03-01 07:04:11 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks, I'll look into it. Just like you, I'm unclear whether isdir() vs. isfile() should automatically dereference the link.

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-02-28 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com 2010-02-28 02:43:05 PST --- I would point out that my changes appear to fix bug 1635, so fixing this bug could result in that one getting fixed at the same time. I also noticed that I

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-02-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #572 is|0 |1

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-02-26 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com 2010-02-26 00:35:59 PST --- Created an attachment (id=574) Patch file for next attempt at fixing problem (instead of the full file). Here's a patch if you'd prefer that to the fully

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com 2010-02-24 08:46:30 PST --- The main problem with having isdir() and isfile() continuing to use stat, and having the programmer just call issymlink() to check whether it's a link is

[Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account

2010-02-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3848 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmail.com 2010-02-24 23:31:35 PST --- Actually, after playing around with this a bit more, I think that I'm leaning towards it being more useful for isdir() and isfile() to use stat. It can