https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3878
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3878
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3878
Dmitry Olshansky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmitry.o...@gmail.com
--- Comment #14 from
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3878
--- Comment #13 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-11-26 04:57:12 PST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> In reply to the original report, I disagree that this is a significant issue,
> in fact I'll often deliberately name a parameter the same as a
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3878
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
Ve
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3878
--- Comment #11 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-03-23 12:32:33 PDT ---
This enhancement request packs two different things: a request for an error
message, and an alternative request for syntax sugar. To manage the two ideas
it's better to spli
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3878
--- Comment #10 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-03-21 15:01:43 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
A simpler solution are classes with automatic constructors:
class Foo {
string x;
int y = 1;
}
void main() {
Foo f1 = new Foo(); // Good
F
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3878
--- Comment #9 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-10-17 16:05:41 PDT ---
In this enhancement request I am asking for ideas to avoid a common but
specific kind of bug.
One idea (not mine) to avoid some of those bugs is to introduce the
this.fieldna
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3878
--- Comment #8 from Sobirari Muhomori 2010-10-15
12:41:15 PDT ---
Here we could benefit from const parameters by default. Though this won't help
in a case when local variable shadows member.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/iss
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3878
--- Comment #7 from Stewart Gordon 2010-10-03 12:08:46 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
>
>> (In reply to comment #0)
>>> Less restricting solution: in only those cases, where there can
>>> be ambiguity for the eyes
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3878
--- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-10-03 08:16:10 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Less restricting solution: in only those cases, where there can be ambiguity
> > for the eyes of a programmer, the co
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3878
Stewart Gordon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@iname.com
Summary|Argu
12 matches
Mail list logo
