http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4342
Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |clugd...@yahoo.com.au
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Don <clugd...@yahoo.com.au> 2012-09-27 00:33:34 PDT ---
This if statement is a peculiar mix of compile-time and runtime conditions.
It should be rewritten as:
void f(S...)(S args) {
static if (args[0].length>1) {
if (args[0][1]>='0' && args[0][1]<='9') {
printf("bla,%d\n",args[0][1]-'0');
}
}
}
The enhancement is basically a request for syntax sugar in these situations:
turn "if (false)" into "static if(false)". But it's very bug prone, eg this
program would compile:
------
void main(int argc)
{
byte x = argc;
if (x > 1000) {
lets_confuse_the_maintenance_programmer() *= undefined_variable;
}
}
-----
Will not be implemented.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
