[Issue 4349] Deprecate automatic case fallthrough

2012-01-02 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4349 bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 4349] Deprecate automatic case fallthrough

2010-09-28 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4349 Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 4349] Deprecate automatic case fallthrough

2010-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4349 --- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-06-21 03:17:29 PDT --- Sean Kelly and Michel Fortin have shown some code examples. This D code: switch (x) { case 1: case 2: case 3: case 4: doSomething(); break;

[Issue 4349] Deprecate automatic case fallthrough

2010-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4349 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 4349] Deprecate automatic case fallthrough

2010-06-21 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4349 --- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-06-21 11:19:01 PDT --- Answer to Comment 2: I agree that it's easy for people to understand that there's a requirement to insert a break or similar. This is what I have written in the Description.