https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4427
Vladimir Panteleev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4427
--- Comment #14 from Rob T 2013-03-29 00:06:50 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
I would like to see something like isNullable(T) that evaluates to true if the
type value can be assigned a null.
Eg,
struct S { ... }
S* s;
class C { ... }
i
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4427
--- Comment #13 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-01-12
11:54:22 PST ---
Jonathan can you give us an updated on what's still missing?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail b
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4427
--- Comment #12 from Manu 2013-01-12 03:18:49 PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> I've lost track here, what's left to implement that requires the compiler's
> help by exposing a new __trait?
I think the __trait's were more or less good now (a
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4427
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com
--- Comme
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4427
Manu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||turkey...@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from Manu
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4427
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
--- Comment #
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4427
--- Comment #8 from Rob T 2012-11-17 08:31:39 PST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I had forgotten that I created this enhancement request, though I don't know
> how valid it is at this point given how powerful is expressions are (though
> how
>
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4427
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-11-16 15:46:47
PST ---
I had forgotten that I created this enhancement request, though I don't know
how valid it is at this point given how powerful is expressions are (though how
to fully use them isn
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4427
Rob T changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||al...@ucora.com
--- Comment #6 from Rob T 201
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4427
Jacob Carlborg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@me.com
--- Comment #5 from Jacob
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4427
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan M Davis 2010-07-06
10:05:58 PDT ---
I would expect that immutable and const variables would still be variables,
just not mutable ones. If you wanted to know whether they were const or
immutable, you could do a sepa
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4427
--- Comment #3 from Simen Kjaeraas 2010-07-06 04:29:56
PDT ---
I agree. Many of these could easily be turned into templates in std.traits, and
perhaps they should.
template isClass( T ) {
enum isClass = is( T == class );
}
unittest {
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4427
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis 2010-07-05
18:12:14 PDT ---
Good points, though would == function check when it was a function pointer
rather than a function? In either case, I think that you should be able to
check these in a consistent
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4427
Simen Kjaeraas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simen.kja...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
15 matches
Mail list logo
