https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4475
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4475
--- Comment #12 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-08-15 12:52:19 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> the hash table itself doesn't contain the
> actual key/value pairs; it just contains pointers to linked-lists of these
> key/value pairs. So the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4475
--- Comment #11 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2013-08-15 12:03:49 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
[...]
> Associative arrays have to grow when you keep adding key-value pairs, I
> presume
> this is done allocating a new larger hash (probably 2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4475
--- Comment #10 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-08-15 10:49:03 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Actually, that is not undefined. AA's are designed such that inserting new
> elements does not invalidate pointers to existing elements.
I didn'
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4475
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
--- Com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4475
--- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-08 06:47:39 PST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I don't see why pointers are so bad. While, yes, D is a high-level language,
> it
> is not C# or Java.
Pointers are not evil, but they are usual
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4475
--- Comment #7 from Alex R�nne Petersen 2012-01-07
07:22:48 PST ---
If you need to use x multiple times inside the if statement's true branch, you
end up having to declare a variable, e.g.:
if (foo in someAA)
{
auto x = someAA[foo];
s
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4475
--- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-07 07:18:55 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I would be against making 'in' return bool for AAs. I often do:
>
> if (auto x = foo in someAA)
> // do something with *x
>
> Doing a lookup
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4475
--- Comment #5 from Alex R�nne Petersen 2012-01-07
06:29:23 PST ---
Furthermore, such a change would break way too much code.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail b
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4475
Alex R�nne Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xtzgzo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4475
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-07 06:28:08 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> From a semantic point of view, in needs to continue to return a pointer in
> regular D, or a boolean in SafeD.
>
> But if it's well optimised, the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4475
Stewart Gordon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s...@iname.com
--- Comment #2 from St
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4475
--- Comment #1 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-08-26 16:59:06 PDT ---
See also bug 4625
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
13 matches
Mail list logo
