https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4587
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4587
--- Comment #5 from Andrei Alexandrescu ---
An embarrassment of riches.
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1714
https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1710
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4587
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bootcamp
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4587
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|D1 D2 |D2
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4587
nfx...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nfx...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4587
--- Comment #2 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2010-08-05 10:37:15
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This is a bit comical, because the GC (gcx.d) already uses lots of asserts.
They are just disabled, because Phobos is compiled in
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4587
--- Comment #4 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2010-08-05 20:30:55
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I think, GC should just use special kind of assert.
Why? And how is desirable that an assert allocates?
I agree that the GC *could*