https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4595
RazvanN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4595
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Windows |All
--- Comment #17 from Andrej Mitrovic -
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4595
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sumit.adhik...@gmail.com
--- Commen
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4595
--- Comment #15 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-09-19
03:52:35 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> - `is(typeof(exp))` tests that the exp has valid type or not. For type
> calculation, the code flow analysis and its validation result is just
> unnec
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4595
--- Comment #14 from Kenji Hara 2013-09-19 00:33:55 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #13)
> After a few years of D use, I actually find the above will create problems. We
> often use traits like these to check whether something is compilable, even
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4595
--- Comment #13 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-09-17
12:54:33 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Failing unittest in TDPL:
>
> unittest
> {
> class A { int x; }
> A a;
> assert(!__traits(compiles, a.x = 5));
> }
>
> Such programs must be s
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4595
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@metalanguage.com
