[Issue 4661] Array Literal Incompatible Type Error Msg Should Include Line Number

2011-06-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Issue 4661] Array Literal Incompatible Type Error Msg Should Include Line Number

2011-06-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661 --- Comment #9 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 08:40:44 PDT --- *** Issue 5518 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 4661] Array Literal Incompatible Type Error Msg Should Include Line Number

2010-08-18 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661 --- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-08-18 03:23:38 PDT --- Given the way templates work in D, the original code can't work, but I'd like to receive the error line number here. This problem is a good example to show the difference

[Issue 4661] Array Literal Incompatible Type Error Msg Should Include Line Number

2010-08-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661 David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|rejects-valid |diagnostic

[Issue 4661] Array Literal Incompatible Type Error Msg Should Include Line Number

2010-08-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661 --- Comment #5 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2010-08-17 18:40:32 PDT --- No, I'm saying that since the lambda function is bound at compile time, this isn't a bug. It's an intentional design tradeoff. It **can't** be fixed unless the

[Issue 4661] Array Literal Incompatible Type Error Msg Should Include Line Number

2010-08-17 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|