http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661
--- Comment #9 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2011-06-09 08:40:44 PDT ---
*** Issue 5518 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661
--- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-08-18 03:23:38 PDT ---
Given the way templates work in D, the original code can't work, but I'd like
to receive the error line number here.
This problem is a good example to show the difference
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661
David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |diagnostic
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661
--- Comment #5 from David Simcha dsim...@yahoo.com 2010-08-17 18:40:32 PDT ---
No, I'm saying that since the lambda function is bound at compile time, this
isn't a bug. It's an intentional design tradeoff. It **can't** be fixed
unless the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4661
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@metalanguage.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|