http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4681
--- Comment #6 from David Simcha 2010-08-20 18:10:15 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Deterministic test case (always crash on my machine):
Apparently this test case is deterministic only on your machine. On my machine
it doesn't reproduce
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4681
--- Comment #7 from David Simcha 2010-08-20 18:43:24 PDT ---
Comment from Shin Fujishiro the Phobos mailing list, reproduced here to make it
more public and permanent:
Seems like a bug of Appender.writeCapacity(). It often writes 'cap' to
wro
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4681
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
--- Comment #8 from Don 2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4681
nfx...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nfx...@gmail.com
--- Comment #9 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4681
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schvei...@yahoo.com
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4681
--- Comment #11 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-08-26 05:20:08 PDT ---
This is still full of dirty runtime calls and attempts to emulate half of
lifetime.d (though the worst part is commented).
Why doesn't it simply use the D standard way to re-allo
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4681
--- Comment #12 from Steven Schveighoffer 2010-08-26
05:51:15 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> This is still full of dirty runtime calls and attempts to emulate half of
> lifetime.d (though the worst part is commented).
Why are runtime cal
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4681
--- Comment #13 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-08-26 06:20:17 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Why are runtime calls dirty? I don't use any undocumented runtime
> functions...
Because they do more work than necessary and rely on more implement
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4681
--- Comment #14 from Steven Schveighoffer 2010-08-26
06:30:03 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Why are runtime calls dirty? I don't use any undocumented runtime
> > functions...
>
> Because they do more work
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4681
--- Comment #15 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-08-26 10:12:08 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> I'm not assuming anything about the memory layout. GC.qalloc gives me a block
> of data, and I'm using the data. Its interface is well defined withou
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4681
David Simcha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
11 matches
Mail list logo