https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4747
Mathias LANG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4747
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bootcamp
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4747
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@erdani.com
--- Comment #6 from A
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4747
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4747
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-09-25 09:37:58
PDT ---
It makes it so that having named unittest blocks is less critical for stack
traces, but having actual names for them would still me quite a bit better (it
would also help for cod
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4747
--- Comment #3 from jens.k.muel...@gmx.de 2012-09-25 04:04:14 PDT ---
But since unittests now have the line number in its name this issue is only
concerned having the ability to call individual unittests. Right? Because now
you can tell from the
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4747
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis 2012-09-25 03:51:40
PDT ---
It has to do with naming unittest blacks, which is related both to stack traces
and to calling unittest blocks independently.
Recently, it _was_ fixed so that the functions gene
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4747
jens.k.muel...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jens.k.muel...@gmx.de
--- Comme
