[Issue 4965] Lacking int, uint etc. versions of most std.math functions

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4965 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 4965] Lacking int, uint etc. versions of most std.math functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4965 Peter Alexander peter.alexander...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal

[Issue 4965] Lacking int, uint etc. versions of most std.math functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4965 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---

[Issue 4965] Lacking int, uint etc. versions of most std.math functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4965 --- Comment #2 from Peter Alexander peter.alexander...@gmail.com 2010-10-01 05:17:33 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Essentially, they are hack for the fact that integer literals don't implicitly convert to double. Aside from labelling it

[Issue 4965] Lacking int, uint etc. versions of most std.math functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4965 --- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-10-01 05:44:29 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) Essentially, they are hack for the fact that integer literals don't implicitly convert to double. Aside from

[Issue 4965] Lacking int, uint etc. versions of most std.math functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4965 --- Comment #4 from Peter Alexander peter.alexander...@gmail.com 2010-10-01 09:30:26 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Have you seen the code in std.math? It is a really foul hack. If you have a function with 3 arguments, you need to write