https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
--- Comment #23 from Artem Borisovskiy ---
And yes, I was able to compile the code with -dip1000
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
Artem Borisovskiy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
ag0aep6g changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrjn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #21 from ag0aep6g
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
--- Comment #20 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/be4ad4b744f1649f6b010b13a5cbf96582786c46
fix Issue 5212 - no escape analysis for typesafe variadic
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
Nick Treleaven changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||safe
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
--- Comment #17 from Martin Nowak ---
(In reply to Martin Nowak from comment #16)
> We should probably enforce (or automatically) add scope to typesafe variadic
> arguments.
I guess enforcing an explicit scope annotation would make the
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
--- Comment #16 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu ---
We should probably enforce (or automatically) add scope to typesafe variadic
arguments.
--
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
--- Comment #13 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2013-12-01 10:03:31 PST ---
I don't think that implicit .dup is the way to go here.
Typesafe variadic functions are about efficiently passing multiple arguments.
--
Configure issuemail:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
--- Comment #14 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-12-01 10:35:22 PST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
I don't think that implicit .dup is the way to go here.
Typesafe variadic functions are about efficiently passing multiple arguments.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
--- Comment #15 from Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu 2013-12-01 11:20:47 PST ---
Yes, they should be made scope. The specs already say something similar.
An implementation may construct the object or array instance on the stack.
Therefore, it is
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
--- Comment #12 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-04-19 16:00:33 PDT ---
This topic was discussed again in D.learn:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/whlxkcbvkldtmfezu...@forum.dlang.org
An improvement of my idea is that when you use scope:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
Martin Nowak c...@dawg.eu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@dawg.eu
14 matches
Mail list logo