https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
Basile-z changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|b2.t...@gmx.com |
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
Basile-z changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
--- Comment #16 from Kenji Hara ---
(In reply to Shachar Shemesh from comment #14)
> But it is not printing the message.
Recently I opened a PR to update core language specifications.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1040
In
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan M Davis ---
(In reply to Shachar Shemesh from comment #14)
> (In reply to Jonathan M Davis from comment #13)
> > Either way, it's killing the program like it's supposed to.
>
> But it is not printing the message.
>
> An
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
--- Comment #14 from Shachar Shemesh ---
(In reply to Jonathan M Davis from comment #13)
> Either way, it's killing the program like it's supposed to.
But it is not printing the message.
Yes, I think the spec is wrong (and, at least when opening a n
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan M Davis ---
On a side note, I just tried this on FreeBSD with -release, and I get a "bus
error" rather than a segmentation fault, so the behavior there is slightly
different from Linux, if that matters at all. Either way,
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan M Davis ---
(In reply to Shachar Shemesh from comment #11)
> Quoth the same spec:
> void main()
> {
> assert(0, "an" ~ "error message");
> }
>
> When compiled and run, it will produce the message:
> Error: AssertError
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
Shachar Shemesh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|D1 & D2 |D2
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
Alexander Tankeev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||atank...@gmail.com
--- Comment #10
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
--- Comment #8 from Iain Buclaw 2011-03-09 12:10:47 PST ---
Some notes:
- sigaction can be used to catch signals
- signals caught have a packed struct with some simple information attached.
- si_signo: Signal number (ie: SIGSEGV = 11).
- si_
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #7
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
--- Comment #6 from Don 2011-03-06 07:49:39 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > (In reply to comment #2)
> > > > Some further detail: 0xF4, the HLT opcode, is a privileged instruction;
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw 2011-03-06 04:49:31 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> > > Some further detail: 0xF4, the HLT opcode, is a privileged instruction; it
> > > doesn't actually
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
--- Comment #4 from Don 2011-03-05 18:28:56 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Some further detail: 0xF4, the HLT opcode, is a privileged instruction; it
> > doesn't actually get executed. Instead, a Privileged Inst
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw 2011-03-05 05:09:41 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Some further detail: 0xF4, the HLT opcode, is a privileged instruction; it
> doesn't actually get executed. Instead, a Privileged Instruction hardware
> exce
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
--- Comment #2 from Don 2011-03-03 23:46:40 PST ---
Some further detail: 0xF4, the HLT opcode, is a privileged instruction; it
doesn't actually get executed. Instead, a Privileged Instruction hardware
exception is raised. I would expect Linux t
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5517
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au
Component|DMD
19 matches
Mail list logo
