[Issue 5872] core.demangle, core.sys.*, core.stdc.* not documented

2011-05-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872 Sean Kelly changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Issue 5872] core.demangle, core.sys.*, core.stdc.* not documented

2011-05-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872 --- Comment #2 from kenn...@gmail.com 2011-05-06 11:21:47 PDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I'll take care of core.demangle. core.sys.* and core.stdc.* are interfaces > for > C libraries and I'd expect the user to refer to the documentation f

[Issue 5872] core.demangle, core.sys.*, core.stdc.* not documented

2011-05-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872 Jacob Carlborg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@me.com --- Comment #3 from Jacob

[Issue 5872] core.demangle, core.sys.*, core.stdc.* not documented

2011-05-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872 --- Comment #4 from Sean Kelly 2011-05-09 15:25:28 PDT --- The module headers already say which spec they follow. What if I added a hyperlink to the official docs (when available) as well? -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issu

[Issue 5872] core.demangle, core.sys.*, core.stdc.* not documented

2011-05-10 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5872 --- Comment #5 from Jacob Carlborg 2011-05-10 00:21:46 PDT --- I think (In reply to comment #4) > The module headers already say which spec they follow. What if I added a > hyperlink to the official docs (when available) as well? To me, ISO/I