http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6185
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stas...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #12 from yebb
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6185
yebblies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r.97...@gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from yebb
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6185
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pun...@coverify.org
--- Comment #10
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6185
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cbkbbej...@mailinator.com
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6185
Walter Bright changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com
Seve
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6185
--- Comment #7 from Kenji Hara 2012-01-24 06:01:13 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Before 2.053, "foo".toUTF16z is rewritten to toUTF16("foo");
> After 2.054, it is rewitten to .toUTF16("foo");
> Therefore current D2 requires module level fu
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6185
--- Comment #6 from Kenji Hara 2012-01-24 05:58:30 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
>
> > Ah, sorry, it is my mistake. Replace 'toUTF16' to 'toUTF16z'.
>
> What's bad in rewriting it as toUTF16z("foo")?
I found an
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6185
--- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-22 09:05:49 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Ah, sorry, it is my mistake. Replace 'toUTF16' to 'toUTF16z'.
What's bad in rewriting it as toUTF16z("foo")?
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.p
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6185
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara 2012-01-22 08:07:51 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Before 2.053, "foo".toUTF16z is rewritten to toUTF16("foo");
> > After 2.054, it is rewitten to .toUTF16("foo");
>
> What's bad
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6185
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-01-22 07:07:32 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Before 2.053, "foo".toUTF16z is rewritten to toUTF16("foo");
> After 2.054, it is rewitten to .toUTF16("foo");
What's bad in rewriting it as toUTF
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6185
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara 2012-01-22 05:30:13 PST ---
Before 2.053, "foo".toUTF16z is rewritten to toUTF16("foo");
After 2.054, it is rewitten to .toUTF16("foo");
Therefore current D2 requires module level function for UFCS.
But I don't k
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6185
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Com
12 matches
Mail list logo