http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6733
--- Comment #6 from Don 2011-10-21 05:05:58 PDT ---
Reduced test case:
void bug6733(int a, int b) pure nothrow { }
void main() {
int z;
bug6733(z++, z++);
}
This is definitely a backend bug. What happens is, that since it's pure nothro
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6733
--- Comment #5 from Don 2011-10-21 01:19:10 PDT ---
Actually this is more a pseudo-regresssion, it's just an expansion of an
existing bug into a few more cases. Walter's commit has nothing to do with the
root cause. The test case below fails in
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6733
--- Comment #4 from Don 2011-10-21 01:04:13 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I just bisected it down to:
>
> commit 4c9661fa9fbd427909a334133dfc7f3869e47c31
> Author: Walter Bright
> Date: Thu Jun 23 00:50:46 2011 -0700
>
> nothrow i
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6733
Brad Roberts changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bra...@puremagic.com
--- Comment #3 fro
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6733
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
