[Issue 7685] Cannot initialize const field if field initializer present

2012-12-28 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7685 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME -- Configure issuemail: http:

[Issue 7685] Cannot initialize const field if field initializer present

2012-12-27 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7685 Andrej Mitrovic changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 7685] Cannot initialize const field if field initializer present

2012-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7685 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic 2012-03-11 08:31:29 PDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > So even if the above should be > legal, I think it should be allowed if the field initializer is void. Sorry, that should read 'even if the above shoul