https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8219
Basile-z changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|b2.t...@gmx.com |
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8219
Steven Schveighoffer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schvei...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #10 fr
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8219
b2.t...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8219
--- Comment #8 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2012-10-06
19:52:20 PDT ---
Thanks, Brad fixed it (and added a unittest). I'm not that bright.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving th
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8219
--- Comment #7 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-10-06 06:09:35 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> could you please compare again against everything?
Andrei, unfortunately I think there is a bug in your code, this prints "1-":
import std.stdio
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8219
--- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-10-04 15:50:29 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> could you please compare again against everything?
I have re-compiled druntime and Phobos (but not dmd, because in the meantime it
has not change
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8219
--- Comment #5 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2012-10-04
14:44:55 PDT ---
bearophile, I committed
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/28e1c98d69a0258992068f4410bdd62c46f5474a
could you please compare again against everything?
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8219
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@metalanguage.com
--- Comm
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8219
--- Comment #3 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2012-10-04 10:54:38 PDT ---
Now the runtime for the write1 D benchmark is 1.12 seconds, it's a significant
improvement.
When N = 10_000_000 the D version takes about 5.61 seconds, while the Java
progra
/e281d8deaa8e6adbc42ee5f6dd69d303a7d67b58
Fix Issue 8219 - File.writeln is slow
There is absolutely no need to explicitly flush a stream on new line because it
is expected only for console output which is line buffered or unbuffered by
default.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8219
Denis Shelomovskij changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||verylonglogin@gmail.com
--- C
11 matches
Mail list logo