[Issue 8339] is(typeof(...)) is reporting true when it's false due to nested function error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8339 --- Comment #6 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-08-21 12:53:13 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd

[Issue 8339] is(typeof(...)) is reporting true when it's false due to nested function error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8339 Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8339] is(typeof(...)) is reporting true when it's false due to nested function error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8339 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-08-18 08:24:06 PDT --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos

[Issue 8339] is(typeof(...)) is reporting true when it's false due to nested function error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8339 --- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2012-07-16 07:13:18 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) We use is(typeof(exp)) to check for compilability all over the place. Are you saying that we should be using __traits(compiles, exp) instead?

[Issue 8339] is(typeof(...)) is reporting true when it's false due to nested function error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8339 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-07-15 22:48:35 PDT --- We use is(typeof(exp)) to check for compilability all over the place. Are you saying that we should be using __traits(compiles, exp) instead? Using

[Issue 8339] is(typeof(...)) is reporting true when it's false due to nested function error

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8339 Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clugd...@yahoo.com.au ---