[Issue 8725] segmentation fault with negative-lookahead in module-level regex

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8725 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-12-01 00:12:43 PST --- Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/commit/0f2947d4d1360f0a0f797279e6f13f9569

[Issue 8725] segmentation fault with negative-lookahead in module-level regex

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8725 Dmitry Olshansky changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 8725] segmentation fault with negative-lookahead in module-level regex

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8725 --- Comment #3 from Val Markovic 2012-09-26 09:39:30 PDT --- Thanks for the explanation! WRT the regex string being faulty, I was aware of that; I was just experimenting when I encountered a segfault. Thanks for the pointer about adding @saf

[Issue 8725] segmentation fault with negative-lookahead in module-level regex

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8725 Dmitry Olshansky changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmitry.o...@gmail.com --- Comment #

[Issue 8725] segmentation fault with negative-lookahead in module-level regex

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8725 --- Comment #1 from Val Markovic 2012-09-25 22:33:03 PDT --- Oh, and the segfault goes away if I put the regex creation directly in the call, like so: writeln( replace( input, regex( r"\* (?!\s+)