[Issue 8816] It should be illegal for enums to declare members named init, max, or min

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8816 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Issue 8816] It should be illegal for enums to declare members named init, max, or min

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8816 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Issue 8816] It should be illegal for enums to declare members named init, max, or min

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8816 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||bootcamp

[Issue 8816] It should be illegal for enums to declare members named init, max, or min

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8816 Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |D2 --

[Issue 8816] It should be illegal for enums to declare members named init, max, or min

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8816 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2012-10-14 00:05:18 PDT --- See also issue# 8817. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 8816] It should be illegal for enums to declare members named init, max, or min

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8816 Alex R�nne Petersen a...@lycus.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@lycus.org