[Issue 8819] void static array should have init built-in propert

2013-03-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8819 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 8819] void static array should have init built-in propert

2013-03-06 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8819 --- Comment #5 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2013-03-06 00:21:18 PST --- Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/a4275e7847f553a3a2c038883612af7b68117ce

[Issue 8819] void static array should have init built-in propert

2012-12-04 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8819 --- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara 2012-12-04 16:55:24 PST --- In discussion here: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/842#issuecomment-9420485 Andrei asks why `defaultInit` is necessary, the answer is the lack of void[1].init.

[Issue 8819] void static array should have init built-in propert

2012-12-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8819 --- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara 2012-12-03 19:32:30 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > I'm not convinced this is a good idea. void[] is supposed to be untyped data, > and a 0 initializer is specific to some types, and not for others. In almost

[Issue 8819] void static array should have init built-in propert

2012-12-03 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8819 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #

[Issue 8819] void static array should have init built-in propert

2012-11-24 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8819 Kenji Hara changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||pull --- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara 2012