[Issue 9240] (Regression: 2.058) non-const does not implicitly convert to const

2013-01-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9240 --- Comment #3 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-01-14 07:43:19 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > This is not a bug. See the examples in issue 4251 for how allowing this would > break const. Exact comment which explains this: http://d.puremagic.com

[Issue 9240] (Regression: 2.058) non-const does not implicitly convert to const

2013-01-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9240 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 9240] (Regression: 2.058) non-const does not implicitly convert to const

2013-01-12 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9240 --- Comment #1 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-01-12 19:32:48 PST --- Introduced by: commit d3cd1bf6db3689fb16c8f97572ae8bbf92ec9df7 Author: k-hara Date: Tue Dec 13 15:03:44 2011 +0900 Issue 4251 - Hole in the const system: immutable(T)[] i