[Issue 9253] Review Phobos algorithms and make them transient-safe where possible

2022-12-17 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9253 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 --

[Issue 9253] Review Phobos algorithms and make them transient-safe where possible

2017-08-31 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9253 hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX

[Issue 9253] Review Phobos algorithms and make them transient-safe where possible

2017-08-26 Thread via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9253 b2.t...@gmx.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Issue 9253] Review Phobos algorithms and make them transient-safe where possible

2013-01-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9253 --- Comment #2 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2013-01-14 13:30:18 PST --- (In reply to comment #0) This bug is to have a central place to keep the list of Phobos algorithms found to be transient-incompatible but could potentially be made

[Issue 9253] Review Phobos algorithms and make them transient-safe where possible

2013-01-14 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9253 --- Comment #3 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2013-01-14 21:44:56 PST --- Yeah, some algorithms will have to be transient-unsafe, because it will either introduce unacceptable overhead, or it's plain impossible due to the nature of the algorithm.

[Issue 9253] Review Phobos algorithms and make them transient-safe where possible

2013-01-01 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9253 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com ---