http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=942
Don changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=942
nfx...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nfx...@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=942
--- Comment #5 from Mark Guidarelli 2010-08-13 23:52:24
PDT ---
I have long ago abandoned using D. The fact that it took 3+ years to close
this bug (incorrectly I might add) validates I made the correct choice. D is
nothing more than a play-t
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=942
bearophile_h...@eml.cc changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
--- Comm
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=942
--- Comment #7 from Don 2010-08-16 00:03:50 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Answer to comment 3: It's true that WONTFIX from Walter are quite uncommon.
> But
> here no enough explanations are given to why this change would break backwards
>
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=942
--- Comment #8 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-08-16 04:51:09 PDT ---
Don:
> But reopening a WONTFIX bug just because you don't like the answer is
inappropriate. Frankly, I think it was exceedingly rude.
I have just added a comment. I have not
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=942
--- Comment #9 from nfx...@gmail.com 2010-08-16 09:56:25 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Note that there's nothing still open about this particular bug: Walter said
> no.
Walter is wrong and the argument of binary compatibility is ridiculous
