https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
Nick Treleaven changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ntrel-...@mybtinternet.com
See Als
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
Mike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slavo5...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #13 from Mike ---
Pul
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
--- Comment #14 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dmd
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/commit/f88ab395386b40f544c9f74ba768549c4fa9e66f
Fix Issue 9433 - Deprecate delete
https://github.com/dlang
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
--- Comment #15 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org
https://github.com/dlang/dlang.org/commit/3421e6a9904f11302719a50c033aceb68de0bf02
Fix Issue 9433 - Deprecate delete
https
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
--- Comment #16 from Steven Schveighoffer ---
*** Issue 11949 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
FG changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@fgda.pl
--- Comment #1 from FG 2013-01-31 0
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
rswhi...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rswhi...@googlemail.com
--- C
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
Jonathan M Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmdavisp...@gmx.com
--- Comment #3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
--- Comment #4 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-01-31 08:29:13 PST ---
But you have to admit: if there is "new", there should be "delete" also.
Because it is the natural opposite.
Even if it is "unsafe", the possibility to free even GC memory b
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuc...@ubuntu.com
--- Comment #5 from I
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
--- Comment #6 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-01-31 08:44:46 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > But you have to admit: if there is "new", there should be "delete" also.
> > Because it is the natural opposite.
>
>
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
--- Comment #8 from FG 2013-01-31 08:49:18 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Try this: [...]
> I see no differences if I compare this and delete, except that "delete" looks
> nicer. But I have not made a detailed test, like you did.
Nice, ho
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan M Davis 2013-01-31 08:45:41
PST ---
> But you have to admit: if there is "new", there should be "delete" also.
> Because it is the natural opposite.
Except that new allocates GC memory, which is supposed to be man
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
--- Comment #9 from rswhi...@googlemail.com 2013-01-31 08:57:26 PST ---
> Except that new allocates GC memory, which is supposed to be managed by the
> GC.
> If you want to be managing memory yourself, you should use the tools intended
> for do
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan M Davis 2013-01-31 09:03:21
PST ---
> But GC.free does not calls any DTors. That is the problem. Therefore we need
> something like "destruct".
So, you call destroy before you call GC.free. It's not _supposed_ to
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
--- Comment #11 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2013-01-31 10:10:24 PST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> In fact, if they were to start over, they probably wouldn't have
> even had new (rather they would have had a library function which
> did the sa
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9433
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan M Davis 2013-01-31 18:58:15
PST ---
> I leave the deprecation of "new" to another enhancement request ;-)
LOL. Yeah, well, it would break far too much code for that change at this
point, so it's not going to happ
18 matches
Mail list logo
