https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9551
Nick Treleaven changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9551
--- Comment #2 from Gor Gyolchanyan gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com 2013-02-20
08:15:30 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
Because of the following compile-time errors:
C:\Users\g.gyolchanyan\Desktop\test.d(3):
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9551
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-02-20 08:29:17 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
Because of the following compile-time errors:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9551
--- Comment #4 from Gor Gyolchanyan gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com 2013-02-20
08:31:09 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
Because of the following compile-time
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9551
--- Comment #5 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-02-20 08:37:45 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
This is extremely unfortunate, because this is the only way that I know of to
implement transparent dynamic dispatch.
Couldn't you use
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9551
--- Comment #6 from Gor Gyolchanyan gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com 2013-02-20
08:39:22 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
This is extremely unfortunate, because this is the only way that I know of
to
implement
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9551
--- Comment #7 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-02-20 08:51:50 PST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
This is extremely unfortunate, because this is the only way that I know
of
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9551
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9551
--- Comment #9 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2013-02-20 09:15:10 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #1)
As far as I see, it conflicts with postblit syntax `this(this)`.
Does it? postblit does not have the extra