[Issue 9673] Add --incremental option to rdmd

2022-12-17 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4 --

[Issue 9673] Add --incremental option to rdmd

2022-09-08 Thread d-bugmail--- via Digitalmars-d-bugs
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added CC||razvan.nitu1...@gmail.com Component|dmd

[Issue 9673] Add --incremental option to rdmd

2013-07-19 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 --- Comment #10 from Martin Nowak 2013-07-19 16:31:36 PDT --- Kind of works, but there are not many independent clusters in phobos. https://gist.github.com/dawgfoto/5747405 A better approach might be to optimize for even cluster sizes, e.g. tr

[Issue 9673] Add --incremental option to rdmd

2013-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 --- Comment #9 from Martin Nowak 2013-03-11 11:55:25 PDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Great idea, although we'd need to amend things. First, the graph is directed > (not sure whether k-means clustering is directly applicable to directed > gr

[Issue 9673] Add --incremental option to rdmd

2013-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 --- Comment #8 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2013-03-11 10:19:42 PDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > 4. Invoke dmd once per .d file, producing object files (only for object > > files > > that are out of date). Invocatio

[Issue 9673] Add --incremental option to rdmd

2013-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 --- Comment #7 from Vladimir Panteleev 2013-03-11 19:14:49 EET --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > We should fix Bug 9571 et.al. Issue 9571 describes a problem with compiling files one at a time. > rather than using th

[Issue 9673] Add --incremental option to rdmd

2013-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 --- Comment #6 from Martin Nowak 2013-03-11 09:52:41 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) We should fix Bug 9571 et.al. rather than using them as design constraints. Of course we'll have to do single invocation as a workaround. All I want to contri

[Issue 9673] Add --incremental option to rdmd

2013-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 --- Comment #5 from Vladimir Panteleev 2013-03-11 18:35:29 EET --- Martin, I think you're missing some information. Incremental compilation is currently not reliably possible when more than one file is passed to the compiler at a time. Please

[Issue 9673] Add --incremental option to rdmd

2013-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 --- Comment #4 from Martin Nowak 2013-03-11 09:30:48 PDT --- You save the time by invoking "dmd -c" k times with each cluster. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail b

[Issue 9673] Add --incremental option to rdmd

2013-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thecybersha...@gmail.com --- Comm

[Issue 9673] Add --incremental option to rdmd

2013-03-11 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 Martin Nowak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@dawg.eu --- Comment #2 from Martin

[Issue 9673] Add --incremental option to rdmd

2013-03-09 Thread d-bugmail
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cbkbbej...@mailinator.com --- Com