https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9691
--- Comment #10 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/commit/a6f3dcc6df3edbe9f02e66f8a16b78ce1766c7c8
Merge pull reques
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9691
--- Comment #9 from Andrej Mitrovic ---
(In reply to hsteoh from comment #8)
> Hooray! Close this bug now, or wait for the GC guarantee issue to be fixed
> first?
GC seems to be a hot potato right now, we shouldn't let it block these needed
doc fixes
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9691
Andrej Mitrovic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9691
--- Comment #8 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx ---
Hooray! Close this bug now, or wait for the GC guarantee issue to be fixed
first?
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9691
--- Comment #7 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/commit/436291ba70e4f9abd7b845825b22fb455d3f721a
Merge pull request
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9691
--- Comment #6 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx ---
Updated.
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9691
--- Comment #5 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx ---
Point taken. I'll update the PR. :-)
--
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9691
--- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic ---
(In reply to hsteoh from comment #3)
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/715
Note that I was also asking for the documentation of fixed-length (static) void
arrays, not just plain void dy
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9691
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #3 from hst...@quick
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9691
--- Comment #2 from Andrej Mitrovic 2013-03-17
12:59:25 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I don't like the concept of void[].
Well the theory is the GC would avoid scanning ubyte[] for pointers unlike
void[]. I don't know if that's true or n
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9691
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
--- Com
11 matches
Mail list logo